The unclear division between objective and subjective.
PEP ASKS
In the following text of Taylor Carman: "There are such things as subjective sensations and sensory qualities, but only because we can sometimes conjure them up by abstracting away from our original openness onto the world and zeroing in on the isolated features of things, and on bits of experience that we suppose (rightly or wrongly) must correspond to them, just as we can abstract in the other direction away from ourselves toward a world regarded as independent of our perspective on it.", Taylor Carman speaks about how we abstract the "subjective" from the "objective" and, also, we abstract the "objective" from the "subjective"? Roughly speaking.?
CHAT GPT ANSWERS
Yes, roughly speaking, Taylor Carman is addressing the idea that we can abstract the "subjective" from the "objective" and vice versa. He is exploring how our experience of the world can be understood in two different ways by focusing on one aspect while abstracting away from the other. 1. **Abstracting the Subjective from the Objective**: This involves isolating our subjective sensations and sensory qualities from our direct engagement with the world. In other words, we can concentrate on how things feel to us (our personal, internal experience) by abstracting away from the objects and situations in the world that those sensations correspond to. 2. **Abstracting the Objective from the Subjective**: This refers to the process of stepping back from our personal, subjective experience to consider the world as if it exists independently of our perceptions. Here, we focus on the world itself, treating it as an objective reality that isn't necessarily tied to how we individually experience it. Carman's discussion highlights the philosophical tension between the subjective and objective aspects of experience and how we can, through abstraction, shift our focus to one or the other.
In the following text of Taylor Carman: "There are such things as subjective sensations and sensory qualities, but only because we can sometimes conjure them up by abstracting away from our original openness onto the world and zeroing in on the isolated features of things, and on bits of experience that we suppose (rightly or wrongly) must correspond to them, just as we can abstract in the other direction away from ourselves toward a world regarded as independent of our perspective on it.", Taylor Carman speaks about how we abstract the "subjective" from the "objective" and, also, we abstract the "objective" from the "subjective"? Roughly speaking.?
CHAT GPT ANSWERS
Yes, roughly speaking, Taylor Carman is addressing the idea that we can abstract the "subjective" from the "objective" and vice versa. He is exploring how our experience of the world can be understood in two different ways by focusing on one aspect while abstracting away from the other. 1. **Abstracting the Subjective from the Objective**: This involves isolating our subjective sensations and sensory qualities from our direct engagement with the world. In other words, we can concentrate on how things feel to us (our personal, internal experience) by abstracting away from the objects and situations in the world that those sensations correspond to. 2. **Abstracting the Objective from the Subjective**: This refers to the process of stepping back from our personal, subjective experience to consider the world as if it exists independently of our perceptions. Here, we focus on the world itself, treating it as an objective reality that isn't necessarily tied to how we individually experience it. Carman's discussion highlights the philosophical tension between the subjective and objective aspects of experience and how we can, through abstraction, shift our focus to one or the other.
Comentaris
Publica un comentari a l'entrada